Mere Breach Of Land Sale Contract Not Enough To Prosecute For Cheating Without 'Dishonest Intention' While Making Promise: Gauhati HC
1 week, 2 days ago

Mere Breach Of Land Sale Contract Not Enough To Prosecute For Cheating Without 'Dishonest Intention' While Making Promise: Gauhati HC

Live Law  

The Gauhati High Court recently quashed an order taking cognizance of a cheating case for alleged breach of contract for sale of land, noting that there was no misappropriation or fraudulent or dishonest intention at the beginning of the transaction. In doing so the court underscored that mere breach of contract is not enough to prosecute for cheating unless dishonest intention while making the promise is shown. Justice Kaushik Goswami observed: “…mere breach of contract cannot give rise to criminal prosecution for cheating unless fraudulent or dishonest intention is shown right at the beginning of the transaction. To hold the person guilt of cheating, it is necessary to show that he had fraudulent or dishonest intention at the time of making promise.” The Court was hearing a petition seeking quashing of a Magistrate Court order taking cognizance of the offences under Sections 420 and 406 of IPC against the accused-petitioner as well as quashing of the whole proceeding in the case.

History of this topic

Mere Breach Of Contract Cannot Constitute Cheating Unless Dishonest Intention Is Shown At Beginning Of Transaction: Delhi High Court
4 months ago
Mere Breach Of Contract Can't Be Basis For Criminal Case For Cheating : Supreme Court
2 years ago
Fraudulent Power Of Attorney | Onus Of Due Diligence Before Entering Into Sale Transaction Is On Property Purchaser: Gujarat High Court
2 years, 6 months ago
Mere Breach Of Contract Cannot Give Rise To Criminal Prosecution For Cheating: Supreme Court
2 years, 11 months ago
Mere Breach Of Contract Not Cheating; Giving Criminal Colour To Civil Disputes Must Be Discouraged: Supreme Court
3 years, 4 months ago

Discover Related