PMLA- Even If Predicate Offence Is Compromised, Compounded, Quashed, ED's Investigation Is Not Affected Or Wiped Away: Bombay High Court
Live LawThe Bombay High Court recently held that the Enforcement Directorate could continue investigation into cases of money-laundering even after investigation into the base/scheduled offences were closed. Even if the Predicate/Scheduled Offence is compromised, compounded, quashed or the accused therein is/are acquitted, the investigation of ED under PMLA does not get affected, wiped away or ceased to continue." In Court, their Counsel referred a speech by Former Finance Minister P Chidambaran, responses to Frequently Asked Questions on the ED website and the Supreme Court's dictum in Chidambaram v. ED to contend that the offence of money-laundering under Section 3 of the legislation was a pre-requisite to launching investigation. The ED's counsel asserted that the PMLA investigation was an independent investigation, and that once an complaint was registered by ED, the scheduled offence was no longer required. Elaborating on this theme, Justice Gadkari notes, "Hypothetically, 'an accused' in a Predicate/Scheduled Offence is highly influential either monetarily or by muscle power and by use of his influence gets the base offence, compromised or compounded to avoid further investigation by ED i.e.