
Not a prescription for the poor
The HinduFebruary 17, 2018 12:02 am | Updated 12:54 am IST The National Health Protection Scheme is being hailed as the biggest takeaway for the aam aadmi in this year’s Budget. The only real way to judge the potential of the NHPS is to review the empirical evidence pertaining to some of the existing publicly-funded health insurance schemes, particularly the Rashtriya Swasthya Bima Yojana. In the 71st round of the National Sample Survey, 11.1% of the population was covered by the RSBY and State health insurance schemes in 2014 but according to the Insurance Regulatory and Development Authority, the population coverage of these schemes was 16.4%. According to the NSS data for 2014, among the poorest quintile, 12.7% of households received RSBY coverage, which accounted for 25.9% of all the RSBY enrolled households. First, international experience in publicly funded health insurance in unregulated private health-care markets suggests that in countries where the benefit package was expanded by raising only the insurance limit, private hospital care providers responded by substantially increasing the price of services.
History of this topic

The Missing Link in India’s Journey Towards Universal Health Coverage
News 18
More a private sector primer than health-care pathway
The Hindu
What ails government health insurance schemes
Live Mint
‘Govt is committed to take public expenditure on healthcare up to 2.5% of GDP’
Live Mint
National Health Protection Scheme will not help its intended beneficiaries
Live Mint
Implementation may be the biggest challenge for Modicare
Live Mint
The hurdles ahead for universal health coverage
Live Mint
Budget 2018: Rs5 lakh Modicare for the poor
Live Mint
Health insurance a shot in the arm for rural poor
The Hindu
Poor risk cover under govt. health scheme
The Hindu
Plans to cover NRGEA beneficiaries under health insurance
The Hindu
Insurance sector
The HinduDiscover Related













































