resolution debtors scheme accounts right drat finance payments overdraft income period company act banks guarantee appellant older credit crore accused private default students score million warren loan sale financial bengaluru

Articles for Borrower, search results for sarfaesi

Filing Petition U/S 10 Of IBC Subsequent To Action Taken Under SARFAESI Act Cannot Be Termed Malicious Or Fraudulent: NCLAT
1 month ago

Filing Petition U/S 10 Of IBC Subsequent To Action Taken Under SARFAESI Act Cannot Be Termed Malicious Or Fraudulent: NCLAT

Live Law  

The NCLAT New Delhi bench of Justice Ashok Bhushan and Arun Baroka has held that merely because proceeding under Section 13, sub-section and of the SARFAESI Act has been initiated by the creditor prior to filing of Section 10 application, cannot be a ground to hold that Section 10 application is filed with malicious and fraudulent intent to be rejected …

Corporate Corporate Debtor Application Tribunal Proceedings Filed Filing
SARFAESI Act | Right Of Redemption Cannot Be Taken Away By Insufficient Notice: Allahabad High Court
11 months, 1 week ago

SARFAESI Act | Right Of Redemption Cannot Be Taken Away By Insufficient Notice: Allahabad High Court

Live Law  

The Allahabad High Court has held that right of redemption under the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 is an important right which cannot be taken away or breached by the authorities by insufficient notice. While observing that it is settled law that service of notice upon the borrower is mandatory under Rule …

Court Bank Interest Redemption Auction Right Rules
SARFAESI Act | As per Unamended S.13(8), Borrower Has Right To Redeem Available Till Sale Certificate Is Registered & Possession Is Handed Over : Supreme Court
1 year, 2 months ago

SARFAESI Act | As per Unamended S.13(8), Borrower Has Right To Redeem Available Till Sale Certificate Is Registered & Possession Is Handed Over : Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court, while deciding an appeal, settled the issue of right of redemption of a mortgaged property by a borrower under the unamended Section 13 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Securities Interest Act, 2002. The Bench comprising of Justices Vikram Nath and Rajesh Bindal clearly held that as per the unamended Section 13 …

Supreme Court Property Court Sale Bank Auction Right
Challenge To Recovery Notice U/S 13(2) SARFAESI Act Lies Before DRT And Not Civil Court, Unless Plaint Alleges Fraud: Bombay High Court
1 year, 6 months ago

Challenge To Recovery Notice U/S 13(2) SARFAESI Act Lies Before DRT And Not Civil Court, Unless Plaint Alleges Fraud: Bombay High Court

Live Law  

The Bombay High Court recently held that once a secured creditor issues demand notice under section 13 of the SARFAESI Act, 2002, the civil court’s jurisdiction is barred, and any challenge to the notice comes under the domain of the Debts Recovery Tribunal. Justice MS Jawalkar rejected a borrower’s civil suit alleging that the bank violated Guidelines on Fair Practices …

Jurisdiction Fraud Recovery Bank Loan Notice Rbi
SARFAESI Auction Can't Be Stayed Just Because Sale Agreement Holder Offered To Pay Dues, When Borrower Hasn't Invoked S.13(8) : Supreme Court
1 year, 7 months ago

SARFAESI Auction Can't Be Stayed Just Because Sale Agreement Holder Offered To Pay Dues, When Borrower Hasn't Invoked S.13(8) : Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court has held that a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India is not maintainable against action taken by Bank under Section 13 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, since an alternative statutory remedy exists under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act. Since the Borrower in the …

India Supreme Court Court Sale Bank Pay Writ
SARFAESI | Bank Can't Forfeit Deposit Made After Auction Purchase When Bidder Wasn't Informed Of Challenge Pending Against Sale : Supreme Court
1 year, 8 months ago

SARFAESI | Bank Can't Forfeit Deposit Made After Auction Purchase When Bidder Wasn't Informed Of Challenge Pending Against Sale : Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court has granted relief to an auction purchaser by directing the refund of the deposit made by him, which was forfeited by the bank by invoking Rule 9 of Security Interest Rules, 2002.Rule 9 enables the bank to forfeit the deposit amount on default of the auction purchaser to deposit the balance bid amount within the stipulated time. …

High Court Recovery Court Bank Auction Rules High
Merely Because The Borrower Is An MSME, It Would Not Be Governed By The Arbitral Mechanism Provided Under MSMED Act: Gujarat High Court
1 year, 9 months ago

Merely Because The Borrower Is An MSME, It Would Not Be Governed By The Arbitral Mechanism Provided Under MSMED Act: Gujarat High Court

Live Law  

The Gujarat High Court has ruled that merely because the borrower is an MSME, it would not be governed by the provisions of the Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, including the arbitral mechanism envisaged under the said Act. The bench of Justice Biren Vaishnav observed that though, as per the mechanism provided under the MSMED Act, the …

Arbitration Court Bank Loan High Respondent Mechanism
Borrower Has To Pre-deposit 50% Of Which Amount In Appeal Before DRAT U/S 18 SARFAESI Act? Supreme Court Explains
1 year, 11 months ago

Borrower Has To Pre-deposit 50% Of Which Amount In Appeal Before DRAT U/S 18 SARFAESI Act? Supreme Court Explains

Live Law  

While calculating the amount to be deposited as predeposit under Section 18 of the SARFAESI Act, 50% of which amount the borrower is required to deposit as pre-deposit? The bench of Justices M R Shah and B V Nagarathna held as follows: Whatever amount is mentioned in the notice under Section 13 of the SARFAESI Act, in case steps taken …

Supreme Court Appeal Court Sale Assets Debt Case
'Not Manifestly Arbitrary': Delhi High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity Of Chapter II Of SARFAESI Act
2 years, 2 months ago

'Not Manifestly Arbitrary': Delhi High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity Of Chapter II Of SARFAESI Act

Live Law  

The Delhi High Court has upheld the constitutional validity of Chapter II of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 observing that it is not manifestly arbitrary and is not in violation of Article 14 of the Constitution of India.A division bench of Chief Justice Satish Chandra Sharma and Justice Subramoniuam Prasad passed. …

Court Reconstruction Delhi High Court Rbi Act Chapter Delhi High
Section 14 SARFAESI Act - CMM/DM Not Required To Adjudicate Disputes Between Borrower/ Third Party And Secured Creditor: Supreme Court
2 years, 2 months ago

Section 14 SARFAESI Act - CMM/DM Not Required To Adjudicate Disputes Between Borrower/ Third Party And Secured Creditor: Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court observed that, while considering an application under Section 14 SARFAESI Act, the CMM/DM is not required to adjudicate the dispute between the borrower and the secured creditor and/or between any other third party and the secured creditor with respect to the secured assets.Once all the requirements under Section 14 of the SARFAESI Act are complied. The Supreme …

Supreme Court Court Assets Party Act Possession District Magistrate
[S.14 SARFAESI Act] Jurisdiction Of DM Purely Ministerial In Nature; Not Empowered To Hear Borrower/ Third Parties: Bombay High Court
2 years, 3 months ago

[S.14 SARFAESI Act] Jurisdiction Of DM Purely Ministerial In Nature; Not Empowered To Hear Borrower/ Third Parties: Bombay High Court

Live Law  

Observing that the jurisdiction of the District Magistrate is limited only to assisting secured creditors in taking possession of secured assets under the SARFAESI Act, the Bombay High Court held that the DM isn't empowered to hear the borrower or third parties while deciding application filed by secured creditor. "The jurisdiction of the CMM/DM under Section 14 of the SARFAESI …

High Court Application Act Possession Third Parties Petitioner Borrower
Writ Court Cannot Examine Transactions Between Bank & Borrower As They Are Essentially Contractual In Nature: Karnataka High Court
2 years, 4 months ago

Writ Court Cannot Examine Transactions Between Bank & Borrower As They Are Essentially Contractual In Nature: Karnataka High Court

Live Law  

The Karnataka High Court has said that writ courts neither have means nor the expertise to re-evaluate the "prudential decisions" of the Banks that are made in the ordinary course of their commercial transactions with accumulated wisdom in the trade. Further it said, "Credit facilities have been recalled at once reveals that the transaction has the overtones of commercial elements; …

Court Bank Judicial Review Writ Rbi Bench Contra
Karnataka High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity Of Proviso (v) To S.14(1) SARFAESI Act
2 years, 8 months ago

Karnataka High Court Upholds Constitutional Validity Of Proviso (v) To S.14(1) SARFAESI Act

Live Law  

The Karnataka High Court has upheld the Constitutional validity of proviso Section 14 of the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002.Section 14 provides procedure in which Chief Metropolitan Magistrate or District Magistrate may assist secured creditor in taking possession of secured asset.Proviso. The Karnataka High Court has upheld the Constitutional validity of proviso …

Financial Act Karnataka High Court Petitioner Asset Secured Sarfaesi Act
Writ Petition By Borrowers Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Initiated By Private Banks/ARCs Not Maintainable: Supreme Court
2 years, 11 months ago

Writ Petition By Borrowers Challenging SARFAESI Proceedings Initiated By Private Banks/ARCs Not Maintainable: Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court observed that a writ petition challenging proceedings under SARFAESI Act initiated by private banks/Asset Reconstruction Companies is not maintainable. "If proceedings are initiated under the SARFAESI Act and/or any proposed action is to be taken and the borrower is aggrieved by any of the actions of the private bank/bank/ARC, borrower has to avail the remedy under the …

Supreme Court Court Writ State High Proceedings Act
SARFAESI Proceedings Not Invalidated On Mere Failure Of Bank In Giving Reply To Objections If Borrower's Proposals Were Otherwise Considered : Supreme Court
3 years ago

SARFAESI Proceedings Not Invalidated On Mere Failure Of Bank In Giving Reply To Objections If Borrower's Proposals Were Otherwise Considered : Supreme Court

Live Law  

The Supreme Court held that failure to furnish reply by the creditor as per the mandate of Section 13 of the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 would not entitle the debtor of discretionary relief, if the Court is satisfied that the creditor has considered the debtor's representation and granted it sufficient opportunity …

High Court Property Court Bank High Act Borrower