Supreme Court Court May Refuse To Appoint Arbitral Tribunal If S.11 Petition Is Barred By Limitation Or Claim Is Ex-Facie Time Barred : Supreme Court Case Title: M/s Arif Azim Co. Ltd. Without Copy of Challenged Arbitral Award, Impossible To Consider Grounds To Set Aside Award: Delhi High Court Dismisses Section 34 Petition Case Title: Spml Infra Limited vs Ntpc …
Supreme Court Court May Refuse To Appoint Arbitral Tribunal If S.11 Petition Is Barred By Limitation Or Claim Is Ex-Facie Time Barred : Supreme Court Case Title: M/s Arif Azim Co. Ltd. The Delhi High Court single bench of Justice Sachin Datta held that the court under Section 27 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 cannot determine the admissibility, …
Supreme Court Case Title: M/s Arif Azim Co. Ltd. Need For Broad Panel To Choose From To Ensure Arbitrator's Independence As Per Clause 64 of GCC: Delhi High Court Case Title: The Braithwaite Burn and Jessop Construction Co Ltd vs Northern Railway The Delhi High Court bench comprising Justice Sachin Datta allowed an application made under Section 14 of the …
The Allahabad High Court while adjudicating upon a petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India discussed the difference between 'Seat' and 'Venue' of Arbitration in the light of several judicial precedents.Justice Siddharth clarified,"The term "seat" is of utmost importance as it connotes the situs of arbitration. Thus, in the absence of the specified "Seat of Arbitration" in …
