Articles for Delay Possession

Haryana RERA - No Additional Compensation To Homebuyer When Interest For Delayed Possession Already Granted
Trending News
1 week, 6 days ago

Haryana RERA - No Additional Compensation To Homebuyer When Interest For Delayed Possession Already Granted

Live Law  

Haryana Real Estate Regulatory Authority Bench comprising Rajender Kumar dismissed the homebuyer's complaint against M/s. Authority held that no additional compensation can be granted to the homebuyer when delay possession compensation has already been granted along with interest under Section 18 of the RERA, 2016. Through its order dated December 11, 2018, the authority directed the builder to pay interest …

Compensation Interest Authority Homebuyer Delay Possession
Karnataka RERA Orders Dharwad-Based Builder To Refund ₹38.8 Lakhs To Homebuyer Due To Delay
2 weeks ago

Karnataka RERA Orders Dharwad-Based Builder To Refund ₹38.8 Lakhs To Homebuyer Due To Delay

Live Law  

Karnataka Real Estate Regulatory Authority bench comprising Neelmani N. Raju has directed the Dharwad-based builder named Skytown Builders and Developers to refund ₹38.8 lakhs to the homebuyer after the builder failed to provide possession of the flat on time. Background Facts The homebuyer booked a residential flat on the ground floor in the builder's project named Skytown Luxuria for a …

Rera Builder Refund Authority Homebuyer
Evidence Needs to Be Provided To Cite Force Majure Clauses As Reason Of Delay: Delhi State Commission Holds Assotech Moonshine Liable For Deficiency
5 months, 3 weeks ago

Evidence Needs to Be Provided To Cite Force Majure Clauses As Reason Of Delay: Delhi State Commission Holds Assotech Moonshine Liable For Deficiency

Live Law  

The Delhi State Commission, presided by Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal and J.P. Agrawal, held Asootech Moonshine Developers liable for deficiency in service due to delay in handing over possession citing force Majure clause. Furthermore, it was held that the developer needs to provide substantiating evidence to show that Force Majeure conditions caused the delay. Additionally, it was highlighted that the …

Service Delay State Commission Force Developer Complainants
Reasonable Period To Offer Possession Is Three Years If Not Specified In Agreement: NCDRC
5 months, 3 weeks ago

Reasonable Period To Offer Possession Is Three Years If Not Specified In Agreement: NCDRC

Live Law  

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, presided by Justice Ram Surat Maurya, held Purearth Infrastructure liable for deficiency in service due to delay in possession of the booked flat, citing a lack of possession date in the agreement. After several unanswered emails, the complainant sent a legal notice seeking possession and delay compensation, which the builder ignored, leading to the …

Compensation Agreement Delay Commission Complainant Builder Possession
The National Commission Holds Emaar Land Liable For Deficiency In Service Due To Delay In Possession
7 months, 2 weeks ago

The National Commission Holds Emaar Land Liable For Deficiency In Service Due To Delay In Possession

Live Law  

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, presided by Justice A.P. The complainant alleges that despite the lapse of the stipulated time, possession was not handed over, and instead, the developer made unjustified demands for further payments. Observations by the Commission The Commission observed that there was indeed a significant delay in the developer's offering possession of the flat. Despite the …

Delay Commission Complainant Developer Possession Refund Emaar