Citations: 2023 LiveLaw 296 To 2023 LiveLaw 334 NOMINAL INDEX The Director General of Police v D Jayakumar, 2023 LiveLaw 296 The Justice Basheer Ahmed Sayeed College for Women v The State of Tamil Nadu, 2023 LiveLaw 297 Major General AK Gupta v State, 2023 LiveLaw 298 Selva Muthukumar and Others v State, 2023 LiveLaw 299 AS Shanmugha Rajan v …
A weekly round-up of important cases from the Madras High Court Citations: 2023 LiveLaw 332 To 2023 LiveLaw 338 NOMINAL INDEX Dr.Pradeep Vasudevan v The State of Tamil Nadu, 2023 LiveLaw 332 Enforcement Directorate v TTV Dinakaran, 2023 LiveLaw 333 The Additional Commissioner of Customs Versus M/s.N.C.Alexander, 2023 LiveLaw 334 ML Ravi v The Secretary and Others, 2023 LiveLaw 335 …
The Supreme Court while adjudicating a matter wherein the Assesssee deliberately misclassified the ‘Zarda’ produced by it as ‘Chewing Tobacco’ for evading payment of a high duty as applicable to ‘Zarda’, has affirmed the imposition of penalty and demand for payment of differential duty raised by the Central Excise Department from the Assessee. Now CET SH 2403 9930 was included …
The Supreme Court has upheld the decision of the Ahmedabad bench of the Customs, Excise & Service Tax Appellate Tribunal by holding the demand for differential excise duty raised against the assessee, M/s Reliance Industries Ltd, as time barred. The bench of Justices Krishna Murari and Bela M. Trivedi held that during the relevant period in consideration, i.e., September 2000 …
