The Jammu and Kashmir High Court, has ruled that the absence of Debt Recovery Tribunals within the Union Territories of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh violates the fundamental right to easy access to justice enshrined in Article 21 of the Constitution. “.We would hold that this Court would have jurisdiction to entertain petitions under Article 226 of the Constitution of …
Observing that the High Court should exercise due care and caution while entertaining the petitions under Article 226 of the constitution even when there exists an alternative statutory remedy, the Supreme Court on Wednesday deprecated the High Court's interference in the auction sale proceedings completed by the Bank at the instance of the borrower despite having statutory remedy. Observing that …
Taking note of the lack of operation of the Debts Recovery Tribunals and the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunals in many states due to non-filling of vacancies, the Supreme Court on Thursday passed an order requesting the High Courts to entertain applications under the SARFAESI under the writ jurisdiction as an interim measure. "To resolve the problem for the time being, …
The Supreme Court on Wednesday expressed disapproval of the Centre's practice of extending jurisdiction of Debts Recovery Tribunal of one state to another state due to unfilled vacancy of Presiding Officer.A special bench comprising the Chief Justice of India NV Ramana, Justice DY Chandhrachud and Justice L Nageswara Rao was hearing a petition filed by the State Bar Council of …
