The Delhi State Commission, presided by Justice Sangita Dhingra Sehgal and Ms. Pinki, held that the ownership of multiple houses does not inherently demonstrate commercial intent. Contentions of the Builder The builder contended in the appeal that the District Commission had failed to consider that the respondents were not consumers under the Consumer Protection Act 2019, as the apartment was …
The Delhi State Commission, presided by Justice Sangita Dhingra and Ms. Pinki, held Omaxe Ltd. liable for deficiency in service due to a delay in delivering possession of the flat to the buyer. Ltd., the commission underscored that mere ownership of multiple properties doesn't necessarily imply commercial intent. Despite an arbitration clause in the agreement, the commission maintained jurisdiction, as …
