The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, presided by Justice Sudip Ahluwalia and Mr. Rohit Kumar Singh, held that raising demand for additional amounts and arbitrary cancelling of the booked flat amounts as deficiency in service. Contentions of the Developer The developer argued that the complainant provided contradictory affidavits regarding her income and failed to deposit the required registration amount of …
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, presided by AVM J. Rajendra, held that a substantial price hike by the developer without a proper justification amounts as deficiency in service.Brief Facts of the Case The complainant was allotted a Duplex House under the Shastri Nagar residential scheme by the Ghaziabad Development Authority/ developer, with a cost of Rs. The National Consumer …
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, presided by Subhash Chandra and AVM J. Rajendra, held Big Banyan Roots liable for deficiency in service and held that a buyer has rights to a refund in cases of delay or cancellation of allotment. The State Commission partly allowed the complaint and directed the builder to refund the sum of Rs.75,58,000 to the …
The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, presided by Justice Ram Surat Maurya and Bharatkumar Pandya, held that forfeiture of earnest money must be reasonable and not penal, requiring proof of actual damage. Observations by the National Commission The National Commission observed that the provisional allotment letter contained a construction-linked payment plan, requiring the complainant to make payments at various construction …