The Delhi High Court has held that in order to invoke Section 263 of the Income Tax Act, 1961, the Principal Commissioner must satisfy “twin conditions”, i.e. A division bench of Justices Vibhu Bakhru and Swarana Kanta Sharma observed, “Twin conditions have to be met for assuming jurisdiction under Section 263 of the Act, and the PCIT has to form …
The Delhi Bench of Income Tax Appellate Tribunal has held that the assessment order cannot be held to be erroneous and prejudicial to the interest of revenue merely on the allegation that the Assessing Officer has not made an inquiry and verification with regard to cash deposits as well as scrap sales.The bench of Saktijit Dey and Naveen Chandra. The …
The Chandigarh ITAT quashed the revision order u/s 263 holding that application of mind is discernible from examination of the record and that “the power under Section 263 of the Act was exercised on the basis of a mere difference in opinion with the AO, rendering such exercise of revisionary power to be invalid”. The Division Bench comprising A.D. Jain …
The Central Administrative Tribunal Cuttack bench of Sudhi Ranjan Mishra and Pramod Kumar Das held that under Rule 29 of CCS Rules 1965 the President has the power to review any order under the CCS Rules, 1965 including an order of exoneration. Brief Facts: The matter pertained to a departmental proceeding initiated against the Applicant in 2007 under Rule 14 …
![[S.263 IT Act] Revisionary Power Can Be Invoked When Order Meets Twin Conditions Of Being Erroneous, Prejudicial To Interest Of Revenue: Delhi HC](https://www.livelaw.in/h-upload/2024/10/09/565132-justice-vibhu-bakhru-justice-swarana-kanta-sharma-delhi-high-court.jpg)
