Judgments “Such gross indiscipline on the part of the appellant who was a member of the Armed Forces could not be countenanced. The Supreme Court bench comprising Justices BV Nagarathna and Justice Ujjal Bhuyan was hearing an appeal against the order of NCDRC which had denied the claims of appellant for reimbursement of medical expenses. Supreme Court Dismisses West Bengal …
The Supreme Court observed that the merits of the evidence has to be appreciated only during trial and not at the stage of Section 319 CrPC.In this case, an application under Section 319 CrPC was moved before the Trial Court and the same was allowed. The Supreme Court observed that the merits of the evidence has to be appreciated only …
The Allahabad High Court has observed that a court can summon a person under Section 319 of the Code Of Criminal Procedure, 1973, only on the basis of examination-in-chief of witness and the Court need not wait for the evidence of such witness to be tested by cross-examination.Here it may be noted that as per Section 319 of CrPC, in …
Time and again, there have been controversies and debates over Section 319 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973 regarding the stages at which it is to be used, the weight of evidences or the category of persons against whom it may be used. Section 319 of CrPC and its objective The section reads as; "Power to proceed against other persons …