Citations 2024 LiveLaw 216 – 2024 LiveLaw 435: Reception Held In Mumbai Not Part Of Marriage Ritual: High Court Declines Mumbai Family Court's Jurisdiction Over Husband's Divorce Plea Case Title: Shikha Lodha v. Suketu Shah and Anr. Dismissal From Service Is Disproportionate For Misconduct Of Overwriting Reasons Of Absence On Gatepass: Bombay High Court Case Title: Danfoss Systems Ltd v. …
CITATIONS: 2024 LiveLaw 568 to 2024 LiveLaw 616: Nominal Index: Sharad vs. Not Allowing Daughter-In-Law To Watch TV, Meet Neighbours, Go To Temple Alone & Making Her Sleep On Carpet Is Not Cruelty: Bombay High Court Case title: X v/s State of Maharashtra Citation: 2024 LiveLaw 578 Quashing a 20-year-old order convicting a man and his family for cruelty towards …
Nominal Index Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd. v. Ramchandra s/o. “It would be necessary to video record any proceeding relating to the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act 1989 even though the proceedings are held in open court.Hearing of a bail application under section 14-A of the Scheduled Castes and Scheduled Tribes Act 1989 is a 'judicial proceeding' as …
The Supreme Court Collegium has reiterated its last year’s recommendation to the Centre to appoint Advocate Somasekhar Sundaresan as Judge of the Bombay High Court holding that his views on social media cannot be used to infer he’s highly biased opinionated person. Expression of views by a candidate does not disentitle him to hold a constitutional office so long as …