The Delhi High Court on Tuesday refused to stay a single judge order directing Mint Newspaper to take down an article published by it against Youtuber Gaurav Taneja, popularly known as 'Flying Beast' which made defamatory statements against him.A division bench headed by Justice Siddharth Mridul, while dealing with an appeal by HT Media, which owns Mint, observed that just …
In February last year, as COVID-19 was sweeping through the Chinese city of Wuhan, there were sympathetic overtures from India's diplomatic channels in Beijing. Key points: Chinese state media has regularly published stories critiquing India's vaccine rollout, an ASPI report says Indian netizens have pushed narratives that China "exported the virus" and India is "killing the virus" An expert says …
'We Are Concerned About Broadcasts Which Incite Violence' : Supreme Court Seeks Clarity From Centre On Powers Under Cable TV Act A Bench led by CJI SA Bobde asked the Central Government about its powers under Cable TV Networks Act 1994 to control broadcast of content, that has a tendency to incite violence. "We Will Not Stop High Court"; Supreme …
"A criticism of the court is not contempt," submitted Senior Advocate Mukul Rohtagi before the Supreme Court today in the contempt proceedings initiated against comic artist Rachita Taneja for her tweets against the Judiciary. "The three alleged posts in the form of cartoons/ caricatures have shaken the public trust and confidence in the judicial system of our constitutional democracy by …
![Supreme Court Weekly Roundup [Jan 25 – Jan 31]](https://www.livelaw.in/h-upload/2020/11/15/384640-sc-weekly-roundup-1.jpg)
