Candidate Not Estopped From Challenging Selection Process When Misconstruction Of Statutory Rules Is Alleged In a notable judgment in service law, the Supreme Court held that a candidate will not be estopped from challenging a selection process on the ground of having participated in it when there is allegation of "misconstruction of statutory rules and discriminating consequences arising therefrom". The …
The Supreme Court has, in a judgment delivered on Wednesday, highlighted the difference to be noted by the Courts between inadequacy of reasons in an award and unintelligible awards under the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The bench headed by Justice NV Ramana observed that ordinarily unintelligible awards are to be set aside, while the challenge on inadequacy of reasons, …
![Inadequacy Of Reasons In Arbitral Award And Unintelligible Awards: SC Explains Difference [Read Judgment]](https://www.livelaw.in/h-upload/2019/08/28/363729-justice-nv-ramana-justice-mohan-m-shantanagoudar-justice-ajay-rastogi.jpg)