POCSO Accused Not Entitled To Bail Merely On Ground Of Non-Compliance Of Section 35 : Karnataka High Court
Live LawThe Karnataka High Court has held that non compliance of section 35 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, will not entitle the accused to be released on default bail. Section 35 of the POCSO Act provides that the evidence of the child shall be recorded within a period of thirty days of the Special Court taking cognizance of the offence and reasons for delay, if any, shall be recorded by the Special Court. A division bench of Justice B V Nagarathna and Justice M G Uma, while deciding a reference, said "If for reasons beyond the control of the Special Court, the evidence of the child is not recorded within the period of thirty days of the Special Court taking cognizance of the offence, or if the trial itself is not completed within a period of one year from the date of cognizance of the offence, the same cannot lead to the accused being released on bail." It was contended that as per Section 35 of POCSO Act evidence of the child had to be recorded within a period of thirty days of taking cognizance of the offence by the trial Court. The court held that any order passed by following the dictum in Vinay vs. State of Karnataka, represented by Special P.P., with regard to grant of bail to the accused on the premise there has been a delay in recording evidence or for that matter, non-conclusion of the proceedings within a period of one year from the date of taking cognizance by the Special Court, is 'not good law' and it cannot be a 'precedent for future cases."