Relevancy Of Constituent Assembly Debates For Interpretation Of The Constitution
Live LawConstituent Assembly debates are frequently cited before courts to canvas a particular interpretation of the Constitution. Individual speeches do not reflect the intention of the Constituent Assembly as a whole Interpreting the Constitution by reference to the speeches of individual members of the Constituent Assembly is not factual or practical exercise. Secondly, relying on individual speeches of Constituent Assembly members to interpret the Constitution is to permit the dead to control the living. Courts will be persuaded to ignore the text of the Constitution and decide based on the intention of individual members of the Constituent Assembly. The rule in using Constituent Assembly debates as an external aid to interpretation of the Constitution is ignore what the members spoke and focus on what the members collectively did.