
NCLT Hyderabad: The Term “Connected Person” Under Explanation-I Of Section 29A(J) Of IBC Relates To Resolution Applicant And Not Corporate Debtor
Live LawThe National Company Law Tribunal Hyderabad, comprising Dr. Venkata Ramakrishna Badarinath Nandula and Shri Charan Singh held that the term “connected person” referred to in Explanation-I read with Section 29A of Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 relates to the Resolution Applicant and not the Corporate Debtor. NCLT Verdict: The NCLT Hyderabad allowed the application and held that the term “connected person” referred to in Explanation-I read with Section 29A of IBC relates to the Resolution Applicant and not the Corporate Debtor. — For the purposes of this clause, the expression "connected person" means— any person who is the promoter or in the management or control of the resolution applicant; or any person who shall be the promoter or in management or control of the business of the corporate debtor during the implementation of the resolution plan; or the holding company, subsidiary company, associate company or related party of a person referred to in clauses and [Provided that nothing in clause of Explanation I shall apply to a resolution applicant where such applicant is a financial entity and is not a related party of the corporate debtor. NCLT observed that through the above explanation, it can be stated that the term “connected person” relates to the Resolution Applicant and not to the Corporate Debtor.
History of this topic

When Debt Is Not Unequivocally Admitted By Corporate Debtor, Application U/S 9 Of IBC Must Not Be Entertained: NCLAT
Live Law
Corporate Debtor Immune From Prosecution Under PMLA Post Approval Of Resolution Plan: Delhi High Court
Live Law
Insolvency Application Against Personal Guarantor Is Maintainable U/S 60(1) Of IBC Even If No CIRP Process Is Pending Against CD: NCLAT
Live Law
Commercial Wisdom Of CoC In Opting For Liquidation And Rejecting Resolution Plan Of Ineligible Applicant Is “Non-Justiciable”: NCLAT
Live Law
Unsuccessful Resolution Applicant Has No Locus To Challenge Approval Of Resolution Plan By CoC: NCLT Kolkata
Live Law
Pendency Of Proceedings Before NCLT For Approval Of Scheme Of Arrangement Does Not Preclude Financial Creditor From Filing Petition U/S 7: NCLAT
Live Law![IBC Weekly Round Up [2nd December To 8th December, 2024]](/static/images/error.jpg)
IBC Weekly Round Up [2nd December To 8th December, 2024]
Live Law
Decision To Consolidate CIRP Can Be Taken By CoC And Not By Suspended Director Of Corporate Debtors: NCLT Hyderabad
Live Law
Property In Possession Of Corporate Debtor Sold When Petition U/S 7 Of IBC Was In Consideration Cannot Be Excluded From Assets: NCLAT
Live Law
Resolution Professional Has Authority To Determine Creditor's Related Party Status: NCLAT
Live Law
Directing Corporate Debtor To Civil Courts Or Arbitration For Admitted Dues Undermines IBC Objectives: NCLT Mumbai
Live Law
NCLT Asks IBBI To Incorporate Provisions In CIRP Regulations For Treating Transferred Winding-Up Cases
Live Law
NCLAT Delhi: Section 95(1) Of IBC Permits Creditors To Initiate Insolvency Proceedings Against Personal Guarantors Via A Resolution Professional
Live Law
CIRP Can Be Initiated Against The Corporate Debtor Despite Principal-Agent Relationship Between CD And Ultimate Client: NCLT Mumbai
Live Law
NCLT Kolkata: Any Attachment Of Tainted Assets Of Corporate Debtor Before CIRP Commencement Would Always Be Available To Fulfill The Object Of IBC
Live Law
NCLT Kolkata: Provisional Attachment Order Under PMLA Won't Bar Admission Of CIRP Against Corporate Debtor Under IBC
Live Law
Section 7 IBC Petition Can't Be Filed By Power Of Attorney Holder Unless Authorized By Board Resolution: NCLT Hyderabad
Live Law
NCLT Kolkata: IBC Prevails Over State Financial Corporation Act, 1951
Live Law
NCLAT Delhi: Section 29A(C) Disqualifies Those Managing And Controlling Corporate Debtor Who Failed To Clear Debts
Live Law
During Pendency Of Liquidation Application, NCLT Kolkata Directs CoC To Re-Vote On Promoter's Rejected Resolution Plan, Since Plan Value Has Been Increased
Live Law
During Pendency Of Liquidation Application, NCLT Kolkata Directs CoC To Re-Vote On Promoter's Rejected Resolution Plan, Since Plan Value Has Been Increased
Live Law
NCLT Kolkata: Simultaneous CIRP Can Be Initiated Against Principal Borrower And Corporate Guarantor
Live Law
NCLT Kolkata: Revival Of Corporate Debtor Is Primary Goal Of Resolution Plan And Going Concern Sale
Live Law
NCLAT Delhi: Once CIRP Has Stayed, Resolution Professional Can't Be Directed To Hand Over The Charge Of Corporate Debtor To Ex-Management
Live Law
NCLT Mumbai: Financial Creditor Can't Initiate CIRP Against Successful Resolution Applicant On Default Of Payment As Per Resolution Plan
Live Law
NCLT Delhi: Application U/s 7 IBC Cannot Be Initiated Against A Struck-off Company; NCLT cant Suo Motu Restore The Name
Live Law
Party Who Benefits From Preferential Transaction Can Only Be Directed To Contribute To Corporate Debtor: NCLT Delhi
Live Law
NCLAT New Delhi: No Point In Discussing An Issue, Even If Issue Is Attractive, After The Closure Of CIRP Proceedings
Live Law
When Claimant Fails To Substantiate Its Claim, No Error Committed By RP In Admitting Claim As Per Balance Sheet Of Corporate Debtor: NCLAT Delhi
Live Law
Weekly Digest Of IBC Cases: 11th To 17th September 2023
Live Law
NCLAT Delhi: CIRP Can’t Be Modified On Project Basis On Request Of Financial Creditor When CIRP Is Against Company
Live Law
NCLT Delhi Upholds Termination Of Related Party Agreements By Resolution Professional With Coc’s Consent
Live Law
NCLT Hyderabad Approves Resolution Plan For Indu Projects Ltd.
Live Law
Resolution Professional Empowered To Keep Claims In Abeyance: NCLAT Chennai
Live Law
New Claims Cannot Be Admitted When Resolution Plan Is Approved By The CoC And Is Pending Before The AA For Approval: NCLT Mumbai Reiterates
Live Law
Defences Of ‘Pre-Existing Dispute’ Or ‘No Amount Due’ Can Be Raised Directly In Reply To Section 9 Application: NCLAT Delhi
Live Law
NCLT Mumbai Initiates Insolvency Proceedings Against Siti Networks Ltd.
Live Law
No Ipso Facto Absolvement Of Guarantor’s Liability Upon Approval Of Resolution Plan: Allahabad High Court
Live Law
Past Tax Liabilities That Are Not Part Of Resolution Plan Shall Stand Extinguished: NCLT Mumbai
Live Law
Related Party Of Financial Creditor Not Barred U/S 29A To Submit A Resolution Plan: NCLT Cuttack
Live Law
On Approval Of Plan By MSME Directors, They Will Be Treated As New Owners: NCLT Mumbai
Live Law
RP And COC Can Request Resolution Plan For A Second Time; IBBI Notification
Live Law
NCLAT Delhi Sets Aside Order Of Liquidation; Grants Additional Opportunity For Inviting Resolution Plans
Live Law
Issue Of CIRP Cost To Be Decided In COC MEETING, Not By Adjudicating Authority : NCLAT Delhi
Live Law
On A Request Made By CoC, NCLT Is Empowered To Remand Back Resolution Plan To CoC For Re-Consideration: NCLT Ahmedabad
Live Law
Reverse Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process In Case Of Real Estate Companies
Live Law
Resolution Professional Is Only Authorized To Operate Accounts Of Corporate Debtor : NCLAT Chennai
Live Law
Claims That Were Not A Part Of The Resolution Plan, Can't Be Claimed After Approval Of The Resolution Plan: NCLT Mumbai Reiterates
Live Law
Corporate Debtor Cannot Be Dragged Into CIRP Mala Fide For Any Purpose Other Than Resolution Of Insolvency: NCLT Mumbai
Live LawDiscover Related













![IBC Weekly Round-Up [17th February-23rd February 2025]](/static/images/error.jpg)








![IBC Weekly Round-Up [2nd February-9th February 2025]](/static/images/error.jpg)






















![IBC Cases Weekly Round-Up [20th January To 26th January 2025]](/static/images/error.jpg)