In Case Of A Gang Rape, Medical Corroboration Not An Absolute Necessity: MP HC Denies Bail Despite The Fact That Victim Married Accused [Read Order]
Live LawThe Madhya Pradesh High Court on Friday noted in an order that in cases of Gang Rape, medical corroboration is not an absolute necessity. Court's Order Denying the benefit of bail to accused-appelant, the Court remarked, "After hearing counsel for both the parties and the entire material available in the PDF format and the fact that it is a case of gang rape and delay in lodging the FIR in rape cases is no ground to discard entire prosecution case and it is also not necessary that medically it should be corroborated and looking to the statement of prosecutrix recorded under section 164 of Cr.P.C. In the case of Ranjit Hazarika v. State of Assam 8 SCC 635, the opinion of the doctor was that no rape appeared to have committed because of the absence of rupture of hymen and injuries on the private part of the prosecutrix, however, the Apex Court took the view that the medical opinion cannot throw overboard an otherwise cogent and trustworthy evidence of the prosecutrix. Last year, the Karnataka High Court while setting aside an acquittal order and convicting a 47-year old man on charges of raping a minor girl had aid "the very evidence of victim inspires confidence of the Court that accused subjected her to sexual act and even in the absence of medical evidence this court can come to the conclusion that victim was subjected to sexual assault."