Supreme Court refuses to entertain a plea seeking menstrual leave
Op IndiaToday, the Supreme Court declined to hear a public interest litigation that asked the court to order all states to establish policies governing menstrual discomfort leave for working women and female students at their individual places of employment. Earlier this month, the plea, which was mentioned for urgent listing by petitioner’s advocate Vishal Tiwari, contended that a number of nations, including the United Kingdom, China, Wales, Japan, Taiwan, Indonesia, South Korea, Spain, and Zambia, already provide menstrual discomfort leave in some capacity. “The United Kingdom, Wales, China, Japan, Taiwan, Indonesia, South Korea, Spain, and Zambia are already providing menstrual pain leave in one form or another. The argument was that the 1961 Act, which has several provisions that have mandated that employers give female employees paid leave for a set period of time during pregnancy, in the event of a miscarriage, for a tubectomy operation, as well as in the event of medical complications related to these stages of maternity, addresses nearly all the issues that women face.