Bombay HC Imposes ₹1.5L Costs On MHADA, Municipal Corporation For Holding Possession Of Properties Beyond Requisition Period
Live LawThe Bombay High has directed the Maharashtra Housing and Area Development Authority and the Solapur Municipal Corporation to pay Rs. The petitioners contended that the requisition could not have continued beyond July 2011 in view of Section 9 of the Bombay Land Requisition Act, which provides that the requisition period cannot continue beyond 24 years. They contended that since the possession of the petitioners' properties was already taken over by the State Government under the Bombay Land Requisition Act, there was no further necessity of issuing any final notification under Section 41 of the MHADA Act. Based on the notice dated 24 August 1987 and in the absence of any notification as contemplated by Section 41 of the MHADA Act, we cannot hold that the petitioners' lands stood acquired by the State Government and validly handed over to MHADA under Section 41 of the MHADA Act.” Possession Beyond Requisition Period The Court stated that as the lands had not been acquired under the MHADA Act, the State could not have continued to hold the possession of the said lands beyond the requisition period. The Court thus rejected the State authorities' contention and stated that taking possession of lands under requisition does not do away with the mandate of issuing a final notification under Section 41 MHADA Act.