Facebook controversy: From US to Sri Lanka, social media company has faced heat over controversial political posts, ads
FirstpostFacebook’s handling of controversial political posts and A Wall Street Journal report that a top Facebook official turned a blind eye to hate speech by a BJP leader and three other “Hindu nationalist individuals and groups” to avoid damaging the social media platform’s business prospects, has predictably caused a furore in India. Be it India, United States, Sri Lanka or the Philippines, Facebook’s handling of controversial political posts and United States As per this Washington Post piece, the genesis of Facebook’s approach to controversial political speech came in 2015, when company executives declined to remove a post of then US presidential candidate Donald Trump calling for a ban on Muslims entering the country. “Actually, the whole idea of a deal is pretty ridiculous.” But Facebook’s efforts pale in comparison to Twitter which in May began fact-checking Trump’s claims that mail-in voting would be “substantially fraudulent” and labelling them as unsubstantiated and even hid the Trump’s Minnesota tweet for “glorifying violence.” Facebook has also been in the eye of the storm elsewhere in the world for its reticence to act on controversial political posts and curb the spread of misinformation, most notably Sri Lanka and The Philippines. Sri Lanka Ahead of the 2019 presidential election in Sri Lanka, Facebook came under fire from civil society groups for refusing to, what else, fact check politicians in As per the report, some Sinhala language posts used photographs of Buddhist statues lying on the ground to suggest that “Muslim extremists” had razed a Sri Lankan heritage site after which AFP confirmed with the temple’s chief monk that no such attack had occurred.