![That The Arbitrator Is An Employee Of A Party By Itself Is Not A Disqualification In Cases Before The Amendment Of 2015 [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
That The Arbitrator Is An Employee Of A Party By Itself Is Not A Disqualification In Cases Before The Amendment Of 2015 [Read Judgment]
Live LawIn Aravalli Power Company Ltd. v. Era Infra Engineering Ltd., the Supreme Court had occasion to consider the impact of the 2015 amendment to Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 in proceedings initiated before the amendment came into force.The respondent-company had taken a construction contract for a thermal power project from the appellant. In Aravalli Power Company Ltd. v. Era Infra Engineering Ltd., the Supreme Court had occasion to consider the impact of the 2015 amendment to Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996 in proceedings initiated before the amendment came into force. The Court also added that there could not be any automatic invocation of Section 11 by the Chief Justice of High Court for appointment of an arbitrator, without establishing any of the following conditions :- a party fails to act as required under the appointment procedure; or the parties, or the two appointed arbitrators, fail to reach an agreement expected of them under that procedure; or a person, including an institution, fails to perform any function entrusted to him or it under the appointment procedure). In cases governed by 1996 Act after the Amendment Act has come into force:- If the arbitration clause finds foul with the amended provisions, the appointment of the Arbitrator even if apparently in conformity with the arbitration clause in the agreement, would be illegal and thus the Court would be within its powers to appoint such arbitrator as may be permissible.
History of this topic

Govt cannot unilaterally appoint arbitrators: SC judgment
Hindustan Times
Arbitral Award Can't Be Challenged On Ground Of Bias Of Arbitrator If No Challenge Was Made During Arbitral Proceedings: Delhi High Court
Live Law
Arbitrator Won't Become Ineligible By Unilaterally Revising Fee; Mandate Can't Be Terminated On Grounds Not Mentioned In Schedule : Supreme Court
Live Law![That The Arbitrator Is An Employee Of A Party By Itself Is Not A Disqualification In Cases Before The Amendment Of 2015 [Read Judgment]](/static/images/error.jpg)
That The Arbitrator Is An Employee Of A Party By Itself Is Not A Disqualification In Cases Before The Amendment Of 2015 [Read Judgment]
Live LawDiscover Related














![[Arbitration Act] Pre-Referral Jurisdiction Of Court U/S 11(6) Includes Inquiry On Whether Claims Are Ex-Facie & Hopelessly Time Barred: Calcutta HC](/static/images/error.jpg)
![Supreme Court Annual Digest 2024 [Arbitration And Conciliation Act]](/static/images/error.jpg)




















![[S.16 Arbitration Act] Jurisdiction Of Tribunal Cannot Be Challenged After Submission Of Defence: Allahabad High Court](/static/images/error.jpg)










