The Supreme Court has held that a suit for possession and suit for claiming damages for use and occupation of the property are two different causes of action. Hence, second suit filed claiming damages for use and occupation of the premises was maintainable after a suit for possession.A bench comprising Justices Vikram Nath and Rajesh Bindal was considering an appeal …
The Supreme Court has held that even though an Agreement to Sell does not transfer proprietary rights in an immovable property, however, when the prospective purchaser performs his part of the contract and receives possession of the property, then he/she is said to have acquired possessory title and the same is protectable under Section 53A of the Transfer of Property …
Supreme Court Judgements 1. Trial/Appellate Court Has Full Discretion To Order Sentences To Run Concurrently: Supreme Court Case Name: Malkeet Singh Gill vs State of Chhattisgarh | CrA 915 OF 2022 Citation: 2022 LiveLaw 563 The Supreme Court observed that Trial court and Appellate Court has full discretion to order sentences for two or more offences at one trial to …
![Supreme Court Weekly Round Up [July 3- July 9 2022]](https://www.livelaw.in/h-upload/2022/02/21/410184-supreme-court-weekly-digest.jpg)