The Supreme Court observed that when possession of the immovable property is transferred implicitly upon execution of the sale deed, a separate suit seeking possession of the immovable property is not required under Section 22 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963. The Court said that in a specific performance of the agreement to sale simpliciter, the plaintiff would avail complete …
MUMBAI: The Maharashtra Real Estate Regulatory Authority has granted interest on delayed possession to the buyer of a private firm who purchased a flat in Lokhandwala Minerva, Mahalaxmi, from January 1, 2023, on the premise that the developer had failed to provide possession on terms agreed upon earlier. MahaRERA has granted interest on delayed possession to the buyer of a …
Mumbai: Over a hundred families in Jogeshwari east whose slum tenements are slated to be razed by the Brihanmumbai Municipal Corporation have been offered compensatory rent of ₹15,000 for 18 months by the civic body, as opposed to the usual practice of providing alternate accommodation. We don’t want the empty promise of rent, which can tomorrow turn out to be …
The Madhya Pradesh High Court, Indore Bench recently held that a suit should not be dismissed immediately upon knowing that the same is barred by the proviso to Section 34 of the Specific Relief Act. Justice Pranay Verma further observed that the Plaintiff ought to be given an opportunity to amend the plaint and claim consequential relief- Thus, it has …
The Punjab and Haryana High Court has recently held that period of limitation for instituting a suit for recovery of possession under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act, 1963 is six months. The period of limitation prescribed for instituting a suit for recovery of possession under Section 6 of the Specific Relief Act is six months. The bench comprising …
